My Thanksgiving List

Things for which I’m thankful at the moment, in no particular order:

• Living in a state that, by law, forbids big box stores to open on Thanksgiving Day. 
• Having two arms, two legs, decent eyesight and hearing: so many people around the world don’t. 
• Having all my hair (still the same color as it was decades ago). 
• Sunny weather on this Thanksgiving Day. 
• Being able to eat a tasty meal today without having to cook—or clean up. 
• The luxury of solitude.
• Having 35+ episodes of Doctor Who downloaded on my laptop, all in Hi-Def video. 
• The privilege of living in a deep-blue state.
• The satisfaction of knowing my daughter is happy and doing well at university. 
• A full tank of high-octane gas. 
• The vast expanse of the Atlantic Ocean less than 600 yards away. 
• Sleep. 
• Sufficient good bourbon. 

Corporations Trying to Weasel out of ACA Requirements for Birth Control Coverage

The U.S. Supreme Court is now hearing several cases brought by corporations whose owners are “religious” to the point of wanting to deny paying for birth control /contraception coverage (as required under the A.C.A.) for their employees because it allegedly offends the owners' personal religious beliefs.

This is wrongheaded, of course, and a high-handed infringement on the rights of individual employees to coverage. But one of the arguments sure to be used in pleading the cause for “personhood” on the part of these companies (as a person, one’s religious beliefs must be respected) is the recent Citizens United decision recognizing corporate personhood for the purposes of political campaign donations.

However, there is an important distinction. The argument can be made that contributions to political causes and candidates can affect a for-profit corporation’s revenues and financial well being, because a candidate or political party may be relied upon to support legislation that favors such corporations—or actively oppose legislation and regulations that are seen to have the opposite effect. Corporations are required by their charters to maximize shareholder value: this is their sole purpose.

But adhering to a particular religious doctrine is not part of a corporation’s mission, no matter how devout the CEO or board of directors. Therefore the attempted connection between political-donation corporate personhood and religious-dogma corporate personhood ought to fail by any reasonable standards and common sense.

Appellation 'Entre Deux Merdes'?

(via NPR's The Salt, by Amy Guttman)  

I'm not certain what is the most depressing part of the article below: the general defense of a god-awful-sounding new flavored wine by a "French restaurant and hospitality expert", or the brazen question asking "what's the difference between [a champagne cocktail or Bellini] and red wine and Coca-Cola? Then again, I did know a French couple —each an excellent cook and bon vivant — who routinely drank red wine with poached haddock… 

Brace yourselves, Francophiles. 

First, we broke the news about fast food overtaking restaurants in France. Then we reported the shocker that more than a third of French restaurants serve frozen meals. If these revelations ruin your impression of France as a bastion of culinary tradition, you may not want to read further. 

A French vintner has just launched a bottled red wine flavored with cola. 

Bordeaux-based winemaker Haussmann Famille has already had success with grapefruit- and passionfruit-flavored rosés and whites. Their newest wine, Rouge Sucette, which translates to Red Lollipop, is made from 75 percent grapes and 25 percent water, with added sugar and cola flavoring. It is meant to be served chilled.

Why the break with tradition? 

Wine consumption in France is down. In 1980, more than half of adults consumed wine almost daily, as the BBCreports, but the figure has dropped to just 17 percent today. And so according to Pauline Lacombe, company spokeswoman for Haussmann Famille, vintners need to attract younger drinkers and women. 

"[The cola flavor] is to answer to a new kind of need and a market demand," she tells The Salt. "Tastes evolve in time and we have to adapt.” 

French restaurant and hospitality expert Fred Sirieix cites several factors behind the downward trend in wine drinking among the French: the financial crisis, which brought with it the death of the long lunch hour; reduced legal limits for driving under the influence of alcohol; and a general move towards healthier living. 

Cola wine may seem out of step with French ways, but Sirieix tells The Salt that's because a lot of people have the wrong idea about what those ways really are. 

"The puritanical view of French things is not realistic," he says. "We're changing with the times. We have a strong foundation of food and wine, and it gives this perception we don't mix Coca-Cola and red wine, but we do!” 

In fact, the wine and cola mix has roots in the Basque region, where it's called kalimotxo, and calls for equal parts of each one. 

Lacombe says market research indicates fast-growing demand for such "wine-based aromatized drinks." Of the different aromas that Haussmann Famille tested, "cola was the best mix," she says. "That intrigued many people, and they were curious to taste it.” 

The thirst for sweeter drinks isn't limited to France. Led by Moscato, sweet wine consumptionis up in the U.S., too. 

"Think about it: You have wine spritzers, you have Kir Royale, Bellinis, shandy, the Italian spritzers with Aperol and prosecco," says Sirieix. "You have all sorts of champagne cocktails. So what's the difference between [those and] red wine and Coca-Cola? It's about marketing and perception. It's about what we perceive to be acceptable and the sort of snootiness we have about Coca-Cola.” 

Lacombe insists Rouge Sucette isn't just wine doused with cola, anyway: It contains only the essence of cola, making it perhaps a bit more refined, though with a very similar flavor. 

So how does a Frenchman like Sirieix rate it? 

"It's refreshing and kind of fun," he says. "I don't think I would buy it, but if I was going to drink it, I would make it myself, because I would feel a bit better about it.” 

Gaak! 

For Armistice Day

Dulce Et Decorum Est

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,

Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,

Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs

And towards our distant rest began to trudge.

Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots

But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;

Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots

Of disappointed shells that dropped behind.

GAS! Gas! Quick, boys! — An ecstasy of fumbling,

Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time;

But someone still was yelling out and stumbling

And floundering like a man in fire or lime.

Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light

As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.

In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,

He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.

If in some smothering dreams you too could pace

Behind the wagon that we flung him in,

And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,

His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;

If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood

Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,

Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud

Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,

My friend, you would not tell with such high zest

To children ardent for some desperate glory,

The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est

Pro patria mori.

Wildred Owen (18 March 1893 – 4 November 1918)

Proofreading Test and Bar Bet

Back in the day when we all would walk a mile for a Camel, this little test was usually good for winning $10 at a bar (presuming you had your pack of Camels with you). 

The Test: 

Count the number of times the letter “e” appears in the paragraph on the back of the pack of Camel cigarettes shown (not case sensitive): what number do you come up with? 

Post your answer in the “Comments”. And don’t take too long counting!